Them Before Us: The GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY Side of this Book by Katy Faust and Stacy Manning
I really wanted to like this book by this Baptist pastor’s wife, Katy Faust and her friend, writer Stacy Manning. The title is fantastic. “Them Before Us” is a great motto and it sounds so promising. Parents and society in general should put children first. The slogan is fantastic.
But, sadly, that’s not what Katy Faust is really saying. What she’s saying is profoundly disturbing: That only married biological parents are fit to bring up children.
The goal of this book is to convince you that married biological parents are universally superior. They are fit and safe, and everyone else is suspect.
Although Faust admits that a biological parent might be abusive (p. 52, Kindle), throughout the rest of the book she never tells one story where the abuser is a biological parent.
And that’s just not realistic. A wedding ring on the finger doesn’t instantly make people good, emotionally healthy, loving and kind.
As a Christian divorce recovery leader in Evangelical churches since 1998, I’ve seen it a lot of people who are married, and even claim to be devoutly Christian, but are abusive.
Them Before Us engages in double-speak: The author states on page 54 (Kindle) that the majority of stepparents and romantic partners are not abusive or neglectful, but for the next two pages she tells horror stories: one about an evil stepmother who favors her own daughters over the stepdaughter, then another where she says that stepparents secretly hate their stepchildren (p. 55, Kindle).
Faust tells her own story right up front (p. 20, Kindle). Her mother and father divorced (but she is silent as to the reason). Later her mother fell in love with a woman and the two have been partners ever since. Faust describes her mother’s home with her partner as “stable and conflict-free.” She and her mother’s partner are friends, and she loves her. She describes the divorce as a difficult rollercoaster of losses and transitions.
She may view her own parents’ divorce as “selfish,” but that doesn’t mean all divorces are initiated by selfish parents who put their own whims ahead of their children’s best interests. (p. 48) Many divorces are lifesaving. Although Faust does condone divorce for direct child abuse, extreme cases of abuse, adultery, and abandonment, she doesn’t talk about the scientific research that shows that children who are experiencing and observing abuse, tension, and high conflict in the home (often due to character issues such as addictions, infidelity, or spousal abuse) are being damaged day after day, year after year. About 1 in 3 divorces involving children is truly beneficial for them-truly lifesaving.
Faust seems to have turned out well despite her parents’ divorce. I didn’t find any description of substance abuse, binge drinking, teen pregnancy, juvenile delinquency, or dropping out of high school. She’s happily married to a Christian leader today.
This young woman – a child of divorce – is successful. She is also typical. Nearly 8-in-10 kids of divorce turn out “average, very well, or outstanding,” with no lifelong psychological, emotional, or social problems. Yet she has an entire chapter dedicated to ending no-fault divorce, which would make it even harder for abuse and infidelity victims to get away and find relief and safety.
Faust’s book exaggerates the very slight differences between children of married parents and children of single parents. Often the book doesn’t use real numbers when those stats aren’t very dramatic. Instead of showing us figures, the author uses the phrase “more likely to ______ [have some bad outcome]” dozens of places in the book, which sends the message that the difference is major. This is a very common tactic among marriage-at-any-cost proponents. I’ve got more examples in my video on their shadowy tactics.
For example, the graph on child abuse is misleading (p. 59). It has been magnified by a factor of 50, otherwise the reader might miss the differences in abuse rates between married parents, single parents, and stepfamilies. Only a handful of biological married parents and stepparents commit criminal-level child abuse. Most homes are good or at least good enough.
The book says that nearly every stepparent or romantic partner (except a biological parent) is a significant risk to the children (p. 57). They might abuse and even kill them.
This is a quote from the book:
“Chillingly, research reveals that the question isn’t whether unrelated adults pose an increased risk, but rather how much risk they pose” (page 57).
Also, there is a horrifying example that would be humorous if it weren’t so sickening:
The authors used a study from the 1980s to suggest that two-parent married families were better for kids, stating, “children were 120 times more likely to be beaten to death by their stepfather…” (p. 57). In real numbers, that study found that about 4 in 10,000 preschoolers in Canada were killed by a stepparent per year. We all agree: this is deeply evil and tragic. But when you look at the real numbers, you see that 9,996 of every 10,000 step-parents in Canada did not kill a preschool stepchild.
The author claims to have studies that prove her view. But she is spinning half-truths. She omits the conclusions of many of the researchers she quotes. Those researchers (Dr. Paul Amato, Dr. Sara McLanahan, Dr. Linda Waite of Institute for Family Values, the ACE Study’s Felitti, and Dr. Judith Wallerstein) and their conclusions don’t support Faust’s overarching message. These researchers found that divorce was likely better for children where there was violence, hostility, or high-conflict, regardless of whether the divorced parent stayed single or remarried.
If you look at the footnotes and read the studies for yourself, you discover that kids in single parent or stepparent homes fare about the same or only slightly worse than in a married two-parent home, on average. The differences aren’t as vast as Faust makes out.
Here’s another major fact she doesn’t tell you. Dr. Paul Amato, whom she quotes extensively on p. 110, found that children whose parents divorced had 10 times greater wellbeing than children whose parent “stayed for the kids” in a highly toxic married home (compare -.37 to -.03 on a 1.00 wellbeing scale). Yet there are multiple pages where she predicts horrible fates for kids of divorce.
In interviews she conducts, the author found some people whose parents were so abusive, they wished they had been raised in a single parent or even in a loving gay home, but Faust dismisses their stories, giving them just a line, because they don’t conform to her ideology of children requiring two biological married parents. (p. 48). So ironically, Faust’s ideology enables abuse. It appears she doesn’t care that much about kids’ safety. But she sure cares about her own worldview.
By the way, Dr. Sara McLanahan, author of a 1997 book criticizing fatherless homes (p. 53), changed her mind and now agrees with the Jaffee study, a large twin study in the UK, that found that biological fathers who have multiple anti-social traits and reside with their children increase the likelihood that those children will develop conduct disorders from 1 in 33, to 1 in 8.
Dr. Judith Wallerstein, whom the author cites on pages 109 and 112 was in favor of divorce where there was conflict or hostility or indifference. Wallerstein objected to religious voices that suggested that divorce was universally destructive to children. Wallerstein said she wished judges knew that observing abuse had a powerfully negative effect on kids.
I could go on and on. I’ll probably write a longer review going claim by claim when I have time. Especially how she doesn’t seem to understand that no-fault divorce saves lives, as a Harvard Quarterly Journal of Economics article showed. (In states where no-fault unilateral divorce was passed, it reduced suicide by 8-16%, domestic violence by 30%, and homicide by 10%). My short review doesn’t even scratch the surface. Faust mentions the ACE study, but fails to tell you about all eight adverse childhood experiences, focusing mainly on “divorce.” Elsewhere, others have written critically about her reliance on the work of the much-disputed sociologist, Mark Regnerus, but I’ll let them unpack that. (Okay, you twisted my arm, here’s a link to a letter written by 200 sociologists critiquing the Regnerus paper.)
Several times the author tells us the solution is simple!Just tell the chronically abusive and neglectful biological married parent to snap out of it and behave better for the sake of the kids. Imagine! Just a bit of “professional help and accountability” will do it (p. 111)! Voilá! Why didn’t anyone think of this! (Sarcasm.)
This is a boatload of wishful thinking. A person in church ministry ought to be a realist. It’s nearly delusional to promise change where there is a long-term pattern of abuse, betrayal, and selfish disregard for the interests of everyone else in the home, including the children. What’s even more surprising is that the board chair for her organization is a licensed mental health provider.
By the way, half of divorces in the U.S. are for very serious character issues: a pattern of sexual immorality, physical abuse, chronic emotional abuse, domestic violence, criminality, life-destroying addictions, or abandonment/neglect. And 1-in-4 highly religious couples in the U.S. have experienced interpersonal violence, according to the pro-marriage conservative think tank, The Institute for Family Studies, and their senior researcher Bradford Wilcox, whom Faust repeatedly quotes in her book.
So by her standards, if you’re not married AND you don’t share DNA with the child, you are substandard.
-Sorry, loving single grandparents!
-Sorry, emotionally healthy stepparents.
-Tough luck, brave widows!
-Sorry, nurturing single mothers and fathers.
-Go away, caring boyfriends and girlfriends who are willing to sacrifice for the kids!
-Same for you, solo adoptive parents. You just don’t cut it.
(By the way, Faust never mentions the word “widow.” Is that consciousness of guilt? Perhaps she knows people would object to her coldhearted views applied in this situation?)
Bottom line: This book is not recommended for someone in a destructive marriage. It will convince them that they MUST stay with an abuser because any other option will destroy their kids. That just isn’t true.
Here is Focus on the Family’s announcement:
Focus on the Family promotes an author whose book won an award from an extremist hate group. Katy Faust accepts “Book of the Year” award from an extremist hate group, the Ruth Institute. Book: “Them Before Us.”The board chair of Katy Faust’s organization is Christian Bringolf of Burien Counseling of Burien, Washington.
- What is a Life-Saving Divorce? How Do We Know Half of Divorces are “Life-Saving”? (or watch the video)
- Life-Saving Divorce: Introduction What Is this Book About? (audio and transcript)
- About Me: Why Is a Nice Christian Girl Like Me Promoting Divorce?
- How Can I Get the Book, The Life-Saving Divorce? (Amazon affiliate link.) – FREE study guides for each chapter. – FREE videos for each chapter.
- Myth: Divorce is the Unpardonable Sin and “God Hates Divorce”
- Abuse is Biblical Grounds for Divorce
- Malachi 2:16 Haven’t Our English Bibles Always Said, “God hates divorce”? No.
- “But He Never Hit Me”: Divorce for Neglect, Emotional, and Financial Abuse
Physical and Emotional Abuse & Infidelity
- 130 Examples of Abuse: Emotional, Physical, Financial, Spiritual and Gaslighting
- Pastors Who Accept Physical and Emotional Abuse as Grounds for Divorce
- Severe Emotional Neglect: Toni’s Story of Finding Freedom (video)
- 40 Years of Murderous Rages and How I Got Free! Karen’s story (video)
- How Churches Should Handle Abuse Victims (video with Pastor Neil Schori)
- Help! I’m Married to a Cheater: Should I Stay or Go?
- Married to a Pedophile: How I Got Out – Pam’s Story (video)
- Help! I Am Alone with the Abuser
- Jesus’ Greatest Divorce Sermon – Luke 13 (or watch the Video)
- Pastors Who Accept Physical and Emotional Abuse as Grounds for Divorce
- Myth: The Person Who Files for Divorce Caused the Divorce
- Haven’t Our English Bibles Always Said, “God hates divorce”? No.
- Jesus Said, “Love My Enemy”-Can I Still Divorce Them?
- But I Thought it Was God’s Will for Me to Marry this Person!
- Is Pointing Out Marriage-Endangering Sin Being Judgmental? (video)
- One Woman’s Story: Adultery, Prayer and the Bible
- Is Marriage an Unconditional Covenant or a Conditional One? (Video)
- Does Divorce Shatter the Image of Christ and the Church as John Piper Suggests?
- Divorce and the Good Samaritan Story
- Myth: Divorce is the Unpardonable Sin and “God Hates Divorce”
- Myth: Your Divorce Will Shatter the Image of Christ and the Church
- Myth: You Must Forgive and Forget Over and Over, Forever
How to Find a Good Supportive Church
- Pastors Who Accept Physical and Emotional Abuse as Grounds for Divorce
- 7 Ways to Know if a Church is Safe for Abused Wives (or Abused Husbands)
- Do My Pastors Have a Say about Me Getting a Divorce?
- Good vs. Bad Pastoral Counselors on the Topic of Marital Abuse: 40 People Tell their Stories
- 5 Bible Verses that Say You Should Separate from an Abuser
- 1 Million God-honoring Divorcees Cannot Find a Good Church
- Church Denominations and Divorce Policies Comparison Chart
- Excommunication for Getting Divorced? What to Do!
- Evangelicals Shooting their Own Wounded Divorcees (video) or blog/transcript
- How to Handle Criticism When You Divorce (video-3 parts) Natalie Hoffman, Gina Kaye
- Myth: You Don’t Take God-Ordained Marriage Seriously
- Sermon Ideas for Domestic Violence Awareness Month – October
- Churches That Block Abused Wives (and Husbands) From Divorcing
- Southern Baptists make Evangelicalism Unsafe for Abused Wives & Husbands
- How Churches Should Handle Abuse Victims (video with Pastor Neil Schori)
- List of Every Known Puritan Divorce in Massachusetts between 1639 and 1692.
- Your Kids Will Likely Be Fine After Divorce (Nearly 8 in 10 Are!)
- 10 Facts Evangelical Pastors MUST Know about Kids and Divorce [VIDEO]
- There Is No Divorce Crisis. We have a Sin Crisis.
- Myth: 95% of Divorces are for Falling Out of Love
- Will I Ever Find Love Again?
- Dating after Divorce: An interview with Gina Kaye
- I Fear I’ll Never Find a Healthy Relationship
- Remarriage after Divorce: How Can I Claim to be the Innocent Spouse? I Had My Faults Too!
- Will the Kids and I Ever Be Happy Again?
- Happiness Either Way: Remarriage or Staying Single
- Divorce May Improve Your Health: Depression, Suicidal Thoughts and Medical Issues
- How My Health Improved Dramatically After Divorce: Karen’s Story (video)
- “I’m Off of All My Depression Medications Now That I’ve Divorced” Schari’s story (video)
- PTSD, EMDR and My Major Health Improvements after Divorce Toni’s story (video)
- Christians Finding Peace after Divorce: Shirley Fessel, Author (Audio) or (Video)
- 10 Turning Points: Stories of How Others Decided to Stay or to Go
- Married to a Pedophile: How My Kids and I Got Free! (video)
- Finding Joy after a 40-Year Abusive Marriage (video)
- Can I Divorce My Mentally Ill, Destructive Spouse? Yes! Amanda’s Story (video)
- From Bondage to Glorifying God! 5 Survivor Stories (after 20-, 30-, 40-year long abusive marriages)
Self-Doubt, Second-Guessing Ourselves, and Gaslighting
- Am I the One Destroying the Relationship?
- How Can I Call Myself the Innocent Spouse? I Wasn’t Perfect Either (video)
- Is Pointing Out Marriage-Endangering Sin Being Judgmental? (video)
- Myth: He Wouldn’t Cheat or Watch Porn if You Gave Him More Sex
- Myth: You’re Lying: We’d All Know If Your Spouse Was That Bad
- Myth: It Takes “Two to Tango” and “All Marriage Problems are 50/50”
- How to Handle Criticism When You Divorce (video-3 parts) Natalie Hoffman, Gina Kaye
- Is it Best to “Stay for the Kids”? Sometimes, yes. But Not if It’s a Toxic Marriage
- Bad Fathers Are Bad for Kids, Canceling Out the Benefits of a Two-Parent Married Home
- Researchers Know Your Kids Will Likely Be Fine After Life-Saving Divorce
- 5 Studies That Say Your Kids are Likely to Be Okay After Divorce (video)
- Marriage Does Not Guarantee Good Kids: 1 in 10 Kids from Married Two-Parent Homes are Troubled.
- Myth 21: Divorce will Destroy Your Children, So Stay for the Sake of Your Kids
- Research shows: Your Kids Will Likely Be Fine After Divorce: In Fact It’s Best to Divorce to Get Away From Abuse
- 12 Ways to Document and Protect Yourself in a High-Conflict Divorce
- 12 Tips for Talking with Angry, Alienated Kids
- Myth: Divorce will Destroy Your Children, So Stay for the Sake of Your Kids
- Myth: Your Marriage Would Be Great if You Just Submitted More
- Myth: Divorce will Destroy Your Children, So Stay for the Sake of Your Kids
- Myth: Divorce is the Unpardonable Sin and “God Hates Divorce”
- Myth: You Just Didn’t Try Hard Enough
- Myth: You Don’t Take God-Ordained Marriage Seriously
- Myth: Your Divorce Will Shatter the Image of Christ and the Church
- Myth: You Must Forgive and Forget Over and Over, Forever
- Myth: 95% of Divorces are for Falling Out of Love
- 27 Myths about Divorce That Probably Don’t Apply to Committed Christians
- Download “7 Effective Ways to End the Stigma of Divorce in the Church” (Sign up)
- Download “7 Effective Ways to Deal with Criticism when You Divorce” (Sign up)
- Download “3 Studies that Show Kids Are Most Likely to Turn Out Fine After Divorce” (Sign up at bottom of page)
- Home Follow me on Facebook • Follow me on Twitter • Buy the book.
- 10 Key Highlights from the The Life-Saving Divorcebook: 10-minute video overview OR 10 Key highlights blog post
- Request to Join the Life-Saving Divorce Private Facebook Group (Don’t forget to answer the 4 questions)
- Subscribe (FREE) to my You Tube Channel
- About Me Contact
- Gretchen’s Life-Saving Divorce Interviews in the Media