Forgiveness That Lets Abusive Fathers Off the Hook
Why Focus on the Family Still Echoes Dobson-Era Harm
For decades, James Dobson shaped how conservative Christians talk about family, authority, and forgiveness. Much of that influence still lingers—even when Dobson himself is no longer at the center of the conversation.
Much Dobson-era evangelical parent-adult child forgiveness teaching followed a consistent pattern: soften the father’s wrongdoing, frame the adult child’s anger as the real problem, and urge quick forgiveness as the path to spiritual health. The result was a theology that often protected harmful fathers while burdening their children with the responsibility to “move on.”
That same pattern is still visible today.
Ed Chinn’s Focus on the Family article, “Forgiveness in the Family.”² uses gentler language than Dobson—but it pulls in the same direction.
See the comparison chart below.
Why Dobson Was So Useful to Abusers
Dobson’s article (“Resentment and Anger Toward a Father”) follows a pattern survivors recognize instantly:
- The cruel father is described as emotionally “blind” or limited
- The adult child is told to lower expectations rather than name injustice
- Anger is framed as spiritually dangerous
- Forgiveness is presented as the cure for the child’s justified anger
Pressure for instant forgiveness doesn’t free victims—it often protects offenders and institutions from facing what happened. That’s DARVO in theological clothing: minimize the offender, pathologize the victim’s response, reverse responsibility.
Chinn’s Article: Softer, But Still Dangerous
See the comparison chart below: Chinn’s “Forgiveness in the Family” names real wrongdoing—a chronically unfaithful, family-destroying father.
But watch what happens next.
The story’s turning point is not repentance, restitution, or sustained change. It’s the son’s choice to forgive.
Chinn writes that forgiveness “takes everyone off the hook.” But forgiveness does not erase responsibility.
Even more concerning, the son is warned that he will soon “face the same failure” as his father unless he forgives. The implication is chilling: the son’s failure to forgive is portrayed as the trigger for his own future sin.
That is not healing theology. That is coercion.
Dobson vs. Chinn’s Articles: Comparison Chart of Safety, Responsibility, and Forgiveness
In both articles, the father is described as either cruel/indifferent, or chronically unfaithful, family-destroying.
How each article shifts responsibility, accountability, and safety in “forgive your father” messaging.
A Needed Corrective
Within conservative Christian spaces, there are voices who speak about forgiveness while still naming evil clearly and prioritizing protection.
For example, Jennifer Greenberg, writing for The Gospel Coalition, explains that honoring an evil father does not mean silence, endurance, or submission:
“An honorable response to sin is confronting it… and reporting crimes to law enforcement.”
She also states directly:
“Keeping the fifth commandment means refusing to submit to evil parents.”
That is the kind of clarity victims need.
Forgiveness does not erase accountability.
Honor does not require access.
Compassion does not cancel protection.
Christians are not forced to choose between forgiveness and safety. Scripture never demands that trade.
Footnotes
- Gretchen Baskerville, “James Dobson Advice Useful to Predators,” LifeSavingDivorce.com.
https://lifesavingdivorce.com/james-dobson-advice-useful-to-predators/ - Ed Chinn, “Forgiveness in the Family,” Focus on the Family (Feb. 1, 2008).
https://www.focusonthefamily.com/get-help/forgiveness-in-the-family/ - Jennifer Greenberg, “Honoring Your Father When He’s Evil,” The Gospel Coalition.
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/honoring-father-evil/ - “Why James Dobson’s Article Is So Useful to Predators” in reference to predator Jeffrey Epstein sending this particular article to a female victim. (LifeSavingDivorce.com).¹
:
:
Buy PDF