What Did Paul Really Mean in 1 Corinthians 7:10?
Understanding His Command to the Woman
Few passages about marriage create more confusion than 1 Corinthians 7:10–11. Paul writes:
“A wife must not separate from her husband. But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband.”
At first glance, this sounds absolute. Many readers assume Paul is saying that if a woman leaves her husband for any reason—even abuse or abandonment—she can never remarry. Others conclude that Paul is banning all divorce entirely.
But when we examine the historical setting, the Greek wording, and the rest of the chapter, a more careful and balanced interpretation emerges—especially in the work of New Testament scholar Dr. David Instone-Brewer (DIB).
- For a video overview of his interpretation of 1 Corinthians 7, see: 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvOcZPWflqE
- For his full scholarly treatment, see his searchable online book: Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible (jump to p. 198 for Roman divorce context): 👉 https://archive.org/details/divorce-and-remarriage-in-the-bible-the-social-and-literary-context-david-instone-brewer/page/n197/mode/2up?q=roman
- Quick summary of Instone-Brewer’s overall position: 👉 https://www.instonebrewer.com/DivorceRemarriage/
- Detailed Q&A archive: 👉 https://divorceremarriage.blogspot.com/
The Roman Background: Divorce Was Shockingly Easy
Corinth was a Roman city. In Roman law, divorce did not require a court hearing, legal paperwork, or proof of wrongdoing.
Marriage could end in one simple way:
-
If a wife walked out intending to end the marriage, it was over.
-
If a husband threw her out, it was over.
That was it.
Divorce functioned as “divorce by separation.”
Physical separation plus intent equaled divorce.
This is the social world Paul is writing into. Instone-Brewer explains this Roman practice in detail in Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible (see p. 198 in the link above).
Paul is not writing in a vacuum. He is addressing a culture where marriage could be dissolved casually and instantly.
The Greek Word Matters: “Separate,” Not “Divorce”
In 1 Corinthians 7:10, Paul says:
“A wife must not separate (chōrizō) from her husband.”
The Greek word here is significant. Paul does not use the technical legal term for divorce. He uses the word “separate.”
Why does that matter?
Because in Roman culture, separation itself functioned as divorce.
Paul appears to be addressing that very practice. In other words, he is correcting believers who might be tempted to use the Roman no-fault system to dissolve their marriages.
His command is clear:
Christians are not to end their marriages casually through cultural loopholes.
“But If She Does…”
Paul continues:
“But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband.”
This is often misunderstood.
Paul acknowledges that separation may occur. But if it happens without legitimate biblical grounds, the separation does not automatically equal a valid divorce before God.
If a Christian separates without biblical grounds — meaning without adultery, abandonment, or covenant-breaking neglect (including abuse as an extreme form of neglect) — that separation alone does not grant freedom to remarry.
Instead, Paul says:
-
Remain unmarried
-
Or pursue reconciliation
Why? Because separation alone does not necessarily break the marriage covenant in God’s eyes.
That is the key issue.
What Counts as Biblical Grounds? (According to Instone-Brewer)
Dr. Instone-Brewer argues that Scripture recognizes specific covenant violations that justify divorce. He develops this in:
-
His summary page: https://www.instonebrewer.com/DivorceRemarriage/
According to David Instone-Brewer, biblical grounds include:
1. Adultery
Sexual unfaithfulness is a clear breach of the marriage covenant. Jesus references this in Matthew 19.
Instone-Brewer lists adultery as legitimate grounds for divorce in Divorce and Remarriage in the Church.
2. Neglect and Abuse (Exodus 21:10–11)
One of Instone-Brewer’s major contributions is showing that Exodus 21:10–11 establishes three basic marital rights:
-
Food
-
Clothing
-
Marital love (intimacy and relational care)
If these are persistently denied, the injured spouse is released.
He argues this Old Testament law formed the foundation for Jewish divorce practice in the time of Jesus and Paul.
See discussion on page 198:
https://archive.org/details/divorce-and-remarriage-in-the-bible-the-social-and-literary-context-david-instone-brewer
Severe abuse, in this framework, is understood as a serious form of covenant-breaking neglect. In other words: in Instone-Brewer’s framework, abuse isn’t a “separate” topic that the Bible forgot to mention. Abuse is what neglect looks like when it becomes extreme and dangerous. A spouse who uses violence, intimidation, coercion, or ongoing cruelty is not providing “marital love” (Ex. 21:10–11). Instead, they are actively violating the basic covenant duties of care and protection. That is why abuse fits under the biblical category of covenant-breaking neglect.
3. Abandonment (1 Corinthians 7:15)
Later in the same chapter Paul writes:
“If the unbeliever leaves, let it be so. The brother or sister is not bound in such circumstances.”
Instone-Brewer connects this to covenant language of release. He argues that “not bound” reflects freedom language similar to Jewish divorce certificates.
In this view:
-
Abandonment = covenant-breaking neglect
-
Neglect = legitimate grounds
-
Therefore, the believer is released
This argument is explained in both of his books and summarized here:
https://www.instonebrewer.com/DivorceRemarriage/
Why Does Paul Mention the Woman Specifically?
In verses 10–11, Paul says:
“If she does separate…”
But he does not mirror that exact wording for the husband in that sentence.
Throughout 1 Corinthians 7, Paul usually speaks symmetrically—“husband and wife.” The shift here may reflect a specific situation in Corinth.
However, the chapter as a whole clearly applies its principles to both spouses.
What Paul Is Actually Doing
Paul is:
-
Rejecting casual, no-fault Roman divorce
-
Protecting marriage from impulsive dissolution
-
Affirming covenant faithfulness
He is not:
-
Ignoring adultery
-
Minimizing abuse
-
Trapping abandoned believers in permanent limbo
When separation happens without biblical cause, reconciliation or celibacy follows.
When covenant-breaking occurs (adultery, neglect, abandonment), Scripture recognizes legitimate grounds for divorce.
The Big Picture
When we read 1 Corinthians 7:10–11 in its full context, the structure becomes clear:
-
Jesus rejected “any cause” divorce.
-
Roman law allowed easy divorce by separation.
-
Paul tells Christians not to use that system casually.
-
If someone separates without biblical grounds, they must remain unmarried or reconcile.
-
If covenant-breaking occurs, biblical grounds exist.
-
In cases of abandonment, the believer is “not bound.”
Paul is not promoting legalism.
He is promoting covenant faithfulness—while still recognizing biblical justice.
Further Reading from Dr. David Instone-Brewer
• Full scholarly book (free online access):
https://archive.org/details/divorce-and-remarriage-in-the-bible-the-social-and-literary-context-david-instone-brewer
• Summary page:
https://www.instonebrewer.com/DivorceRemarriage/
• Q&A archive:
https://divorceremarriage.blogspot.com
• Video explanation of 1 Corinthians 7:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvOcZPWflqE
• Why “Let No Man Separate” Does Not Mean No Divorce for Any Reason — Matthew 19:6
• Video explanation of the Grounds for Divorce in the Bible –
:
:
Buy PDF